« “Chocolateville” Ray Nagin won - and it’s a good thing. | Home | How are you my boss? »

In Defense of Nagin

May 22, 2006 by Laura | Trackback URI

[Update: From Expose the Left, the DNC worked hard against Nagin. That ought to tell you something about Nagin, who has supported Republican Bobby Jindal and of course President Bush. Mary "Bring out your dead!" Landrieu is now in real danger of losing her Senate seat.]

Update #2: Mark in Mexico wrote Goodbye New Orleans… and good riddance but is very gracious about listening to the other side of the story. And he’s spot-on about the red tape and Haley Barbour. I’m against cloning on principle, but I might consider an exception in Barbour’s case. ;-)]

Some of the blogospheric vitriol against C. Ray Nagin is completely unjust. Did he make mistakes before and after Katrina? Certainly. Should he have run off at the mouth as much as he did? Of course not. Did he do any worse than the rest of our political “leadership?” No, he didn’t. And yet, because those people have toed the party line, they’ve escaped most criticism for their actions. Jefferson Parish President Broussard received a pass for causing over a billion dollars in damage by sending the pump operators away and outright lying on national TV. Blanco played politics, seeking the best way to promote herself and stab Nagin in the back. Ever since Nagin endorsed Republican Bobby Jindal over Kathleen Blanco, the knives have been out for him. The Democrats and the MSM only like “mavericks” when they are RINOs. And the coverage of Nagin has reflected this.

Just as the prevailing meme is “Bush lied” it is also now conventional wisdom that Nagin is incompetent and corrupt. A case can be made for incompetence, although I don’t think that case would win out in front of an impartial judge who has all the facts. To those who accuse him of corruption, I have this to say: you’re full of crap. If you’re going to slander the man, at least provide some evidence. And by evidence, I mean something other than William Jefferson endorsing him. You don’t have to prove it but at least reference a credible accusation. I don’t believe you can. Nagin has had an exemplary anti-corruption record from the first week he took office.

We had very little warning about this storm. Nagin was out in front begging people to leave long before the voluntary or the later mandatory evacuations were called for.

The Superdome was never set up to be a shelter. But people needed somewhere to go, and given the lack of other options, that was the best choice. They were told to bring food, water, and bedding. It was plainly, repeatedly stated that those things were not going to be provided. Although Nagin is generally blamed for this, after the storm the reason food and water were not delivered was none other than Governor Kathleen Blanco. Hugh Hewitt’s interview with Major Garrett on 9/7 makes that abundantly clear.

HH: Of course they are. Now Major Garrett, what about the Louisiana governor’s office of Homeland Security. Have they responded to this charge by the Red Cross, which is a blockbuster charge?

MG: I have not been able to reach them yet. But, what they have said consistently is, and what they told the Red Cross, we don’t want you to come in there, because we have evacuees that we want to get out. And if you come in, they’re more likely to stay. So I want your listeners to follow me here. At the very moment that Ray Nagin, the Mayor of New Orleans was screaming where’s the food, where’s the water, it was over the overpass, and state officials were saying you can’t come in.

There has been criticism about Nagin’s perceived hysteria in requesting thousands of body bags. If Katrina had actually hit here, instead of giving us a glancing blow, those body bags would have been needed.

There has been criticism that Nagin did not immediately straighten out the Levee Board when he took office. The Levee Board is appointed by the Governor and they are useless. The Mayor is not empowered to change it. He likewise has no control over the Corps of Engineers, who is largely responsible for the damage in New Orleans. If the levees had held as promised, we’d have been back to normal a month after the storm.

Again, I’m not saying that Nagin is perfect and that he made no mistakes pre- and post-Katrina. I’m saying that he’s an honest man, who made mistakes, and is also being unfairly blamed for things he had no control over, and accused of things that are simply not true.

There was no perfect candidate. It was either politics as usual with Cajun Kennedy Mitch Landreiu, who pledged to bring in notoriously corrupt Marc Morial to help decide how to spend federal Katrina funds, or an honest, flawed man who is relatively new to politics but kept his campaign pledge to clean up entrenched corruption.

New Orleans made the right choice.

Comments

3 Responses to “In Defense of Nagin”

  1. Anne on May 22nd, 2006 9:16 pm

    I live in Houston. I saw the New Orleanians come by the busload, and stay by the busload. And I’ve seen the campaigners from New Orleans come here to Houston to campaign, seeing how many of the N.O. registered voters are still here. I was not a huge fan of Nagin during the storm. But given the choices on the board, I’d have voted for him — reluctantly, but knowing he was the best choice on the board. A “protest vote” againt Nagin would have backfired. And he shows signs that he’s grown from this. If another storm comes, I don’t think he’ll make the same mistakes twice.

  2. Laura on May 23rd, 2006 1:30 am

    I certainly hope not! :-) If he would just learn to keep his mouth shut, his actual mistakes would not be so magnified, and it would be harder to blame him for other things. He really gave us a black eye by presenting himself as a hysterical lunatic; the perception of him, and of New Orleans, is far worse than it needed to be.

    We evac’d to Dallas but I know a lot of people who were very grateful for Houstonian hospitality. Y’all sick of New Orleanians yet? I can’t get my husband to go back since he was treated for cancer at MD Anderson - to him that’s all Houston is. But I’ve been there on business several times and it looks like a great city. I hope we can go as tourists some time.

  3. vince on May 24th, 2006 1:39 pm

    You want evidence of Nagin’s corruption? Just read a newspaper. Here’s a copy of the message I left on Laura’s Blog but it by no means encompasses all the corruption Nagin has foistered on the city of New orleans since taking office. There’s not enough space in this blog to cover it all:

    Where does this concept of Ray Nagin as “honest government” come from? Have you read even some of the recent news reports on Nagin’s less than upfront dealings? What about the deal he cut with company to tow cars at a cost of $1000 per car with a Denver-based company, when a Texas car-crushing company’s offer to PAY the city $100 per vehicle, which would have put millions in the city’s coffers (You can read about these “honest dealings at these links:
    http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-5/114301126783720.xml
    http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2006-03-28/politics.php). Do you really think this was an “honest mistake” by Nagin? Or, how about his deal new parking meters with Parking Solutions LLC, a local minority-owned company with political ties to City Hall. Did the old meters become obsolete as soon as the old contract was paid out, or was it simply perceived as an opportunity to award a lucrative deal to some friends? Do you think the deal could have withstood an objective financial analysis?

  4. Trackbacks on November 21st, 2008 4:55 am

Pursuing Holiness is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!