I’ve read several articles like this one at Gates of Vienna regarding high incidence of Muslims raping non-Muslim girls in Norway and Sweden. But Sir Henry Morgan at Reconquista (h/t to Anchoress who linked to this excellent neo-neocon post about government vs. press lies, where a commenter posted the Reconquista link) has done some rather amazing work researching this phenomenon in the London area. You need to read the whole thing, but here are a few clips just to give you a sample –
…I focused on a single crime category. Sex offences seemed a natural choice because all over the world there are reports of Muslims engaging in sex offences against non-Muslims (and other Muslims too, as it happens, where men have the cover of the Hudood Ordinances in Pakistan, or license from the government as in Sudan) out of all proportion to their numbers. Recent Australian events, and the scandal surrounding the Mufti of Australia were being talked about, I’d recently been reading Fjordmann’s work on rape in Scandinavia, we’ve all (?) read the reports on rape in Pakistan and Darfur, the slums of France, the “smileys” inflicted in the Netherlands, the grooming of under-age girls in Bradford; and I was, anyway, looking for an offence-category that could not be linked to personal economic circumstances. There are already enough confounds in the data without having that as a position for people to argue from (some idiot would claim that being poor makes you more likely to commit an offence). So I chose that category: Sex Offences …
What I have is, if not actual proof, then a whole series of correlations. However, on the basis that if you can’t actually prove something fell out of the back end of a dog, but it looks like it did, smells like it did, feels like it did, and tastes like it did, then it might be best if you didn’t step in it, I’m going to publish what I found. You can make your own minds up. I’ve made mine up, and I wouldn’t want my daughter or nieces living near large numbers of Muslims. I think most reasonable, reasoning, people will agree after reading this.
The Reader’s Digest version – which does not do this post justice at all, please read the whole thing – is that in London boroughs which have a 10% or greater population of Muslims, there is a sharp increase in sex crimes which are unrelated to general population density, and not duplicated in areas with equivalent Christian or other religions, which actually show a sharp decrease in sex crimes. After a series of charts which are explained in detail, he writes
if this doesn’t convince you that 10% Muslims is a critical mass with there being essentially a step-change, with no further change up to at least 35%, then nothing ever will.
Read the whole thing. He didn’t invent these numbers. These are crime statistics maintained by the police. And another, disconcerting statement in that post – he wonders at what point this behavior started in the Paris Banlieus, because
It might be useful to know when intifada-like behaviour is likely to start in London. The Metropolitan Police is already considering buying water-cannon – do they already know what we are groping our way towards here?
The west is at war. It’s past time to acknowledge it.
Comments