2007
Norwegian Women: Getting Raped is Your Fault
When I read this quote, I had to wonder - where are the feminists?
How can anyone - any liberal - let this stand? Why are the only people outraged about this conservative? If anything ought to be bipartisan and cross cultural, anger at this man’s attitude should be. No woman in any society should be treated this way.
“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”
Follow the link for more on this at Ace. The idea that we must adapt to immigrants is ridiculous enough. But the idea that the failure to do so entitles those immigrants to punish us by raping us is an outrage. While I’m in favor of women behaving with common sense - don’t go to a bar, get sloppily drunk, stagger home alone, then express surprise when a criminal victimizes you - that’s not what’s going on here. And even when that does happen, the criminal does not get a free pass because the woman was unwise. No one says that a normal reaction to provocative dress and behaving like a victim is rape; they say that the crime is reprehensible. Women who are raped under any circumstances deserve society’s backing and a strong prosecution against their attackers.
If we, as western society, are willing to sacrifice our sisters and daughters on the altar of multiculturalism, then we have already lost the war with Islam, and continued fighting is a waste of time.
This is a repost from November, but I think it bears repeating, and the link to the Reconquista article is a must-follow:
Muslim - Sex Crime Correlation
I’ve read several articles like this one at Gates of Vienna regarding high incidence of Muslims raping non-Muslim girls in Norway and Sweden. But Sir Henry Morgan at Reconquista (h/t to Anchoress who linked to this excellent neo-neocon post about government vs. press lies, where a commenter posted the Reconquista link) has done some rather amazing work researching this phenomenon in the London area. You need to read the whole thing, but here are a few clips just to give you a sample -
…I focused on a single crime category. Sex offences seemed a natural choice because all over the world there are reports of Muslims engaging in sex offences against non-Muslims (and other Muslims too, as it happens, where men have the cover of the Hudood Ordinances in Pakistan, or license from the government as in Sudan) out of all proportion to their numbers. Recent Australian events, and the scandal surrounding the Mufti of Australia were being talked about, I’d recently been reading Fjordmann’s work on rape in Scandinavia, we’ve all (?) read the reports on rape in Pakistan and Darfur, the slums of France, the “smileys” inflicted in the Netherlands, the grooming of under-age girls in Bradford; and I was, anyway, looking for an offence-category that could not be linked to personal economic circumstances. There are already enough confounds in the data without having that as a position for people to argue from (some idiot would claim that being poor makes you more likely to commit an offence). So I chose that category: Sex Offences …
What I have is, if not actual proof, then a whole series of correlations. However, on the basis that if you can’t actually prove something fell out of the back end of a dog, but it looks like it did, smells like it did, feels like it did, and tastes like it did, then it might be best if you didn’t step in it, I’m going to publish what I found. You can make your own minds up. I’ve made mine up, and I wouldn’t want my daughter or nieces living near large numbers of Muslims. I think most reasonable, reasoning, people will agree after reading this.
The Reader’s Digest version - which does not do this post justice at all, please read the whole thing - is that in London boroughs which have a 10% or greater population of Muslims, there is a sharp increase in sex crimes which are unrelated to general population density, and not duplicated in areas with equivalent Christian or other religions, which actually show a sharp decrease in sex crimes. After a series of charts which are explained in detail, he writes
if this doesn’t convince you that 10% Muslims is a critical mass with there being essentially a step-change, with no further change up to at least 35%, then nothing ever will.
Read the whole thing. He didn’t invent these numbers. These are crime statistics maintained by the police. And another, disconcerting statement in that post - he wonders at what point this behavior started in the Paris Banlieus, because
It might be useful to know when intifada-like behaviour is likely to start in London. The Metropolitan Police is already considering buying water-cannon – do they already know what we are groping our way towards here?
The west is at war. It’s past time to acknowledge it.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Random Yak, Adam’s Blog, Big Dog’s Weblog, Right Truth, basil’s blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Jo’s Cafe, Rightwing Guy, third world county, The HILL Chronicles, Wake Up America, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, stikNstein… has no mercy, Pirate’s Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, Renaissance Blogger, Planck’s Constant, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox News, Right Voices, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Link to Pursuing Holiness and track back your latest and greatest here!
Trackback using Linkfest Haven Deluxe.







January 10th, 2007 at 11:02 am
I don’t understand why the women’s rights groups don’t make this one of their main projects, along with the female mutilations, etc. But they are silent, not a word. I guess that’s not as much fun as burning bras years ago, or just being ‘political’ these days for their own personal agendas.
February 8th, 2007 at 10:50 pm
Rape is always 100% the perpetrator’s fault. Always.
It is a good thing that the professor was in Oslo. Had he said that in America, he would be the less-than-proud recipient of a well-deserved punch in the face.
February 8th, 2007 at 11:07 pm
>Had he said that in America, he would be the less-than-proud recipient of a well-deserved punch in the face.<
I hope so! I posted this a month ago and I’m still angry about it. He has - so far - never apologized or “walked it back” in any way so evidently he meant it and didn’t misspeak or get misquoted.