<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dred Scott and Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/</link>
	<description>pursuing holiness, following politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pursuing Holiness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Great Moments In Conservative Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-36536</link>
		<dc:creator>Pursuing Holiness &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Great Moments In Conservative Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-36536</guid>
		<description>[...] be restricted. Most women have abortions for reasons having nothing to do with health or money. Look at this chart. Most abortions occur simply because women don&#8217;t feel like having a baby right then. - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be restricted. Most women have abortions for reasons having nothing to do with health or money. Look at this chart. Most abortions occur simply because women don&#8217;t feel like having a baby right then. &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james foxworth</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-33044</link>
		<dc:creator>james foxworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-33044</guid>
		<description>he died a good man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he died a good man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32721</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32721</guid>
		<description>Under the thumbnail graphic is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Data Source&quot; which links to the study where I got these stats&lt;/a&gt;.

Come to think of it, your stats are not in conflict with mine - I&#039;m talking about the cause of the abortion while you&#039;re talking about the cause of the pregnancy - but I&#039;m still interested in seeing what study are you referencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the thumbnail graphic is <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Data Source&#8221; which links to the study where I got these stats</a>.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, your stats are not in conflict with mine &#8211; I&#8217;m talking about the cause of the abortion while you&#8217;re talking about the cause of the pregnancy &#8211; but I&#8217;m still interested in seeing what study are you referencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32704</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32704</guid>
		<description>Laura.......could you be a bit more specific.....can&#039;t find yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura&#8230;&#8230;.could you be a bit more specific&#8230;..can&#8217;t find yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32685</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32685</guid>
		<description>Bruce, what is the source of your stats?  They are in direct conflict with mine - see link above.  Please give the cite - I&#039;m interested in seeing what study you&#039;re referencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, what is the source of your stats?  They are in direct conflict with mine &#8211; see link above.  Please give the cite &#8211; I&#8217;m interested in seeing what study you&#8217;re referencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32665</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32665</guid>
		<description>Abortion numbers are far too high…

Over 3,500 per day / Over 1.3 million per year in America alone. 

50% of that 1.3 million claimed failed birth control was to blame. 

A further 48% had failed to use any birth control at all. 

And 2% had medical reasons. 

That means a staggering 98% of unwanted pregnancies may have been avoided had an effective birth control been used.

There are an estimated 34 million women in need of contraceptive services in America — those who are not sterilized, pregnant or trying to conceive.

34 million…if the pill is 99% effective that means 1% of 34mill = 340,000 + 26,000 for the 2% = 366,000…………….

366,000 abortions per year..Doesn’t that sound better than 1.3 million…
And it could be even less, some of the implants are 99.9% effective….
0.1% of 34mill = 34,000 + 26,000 for the 2% = 60,000………WOW……..

1.3 million per year or 60,000 per year….

DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN GET AN IMPLANT (in arm)
THAT IS SAFE, 99.9% EFFECTIVE AND LASTS FOR THREE YEARS?


Implanon is new to the US but has been widely used in Aus for about five years.
The only bad report iv’e heard is if your a smoker you can’t use them due to increased risk of cardiovascular conditions.
Good incentive to give the cigs a miss…………
(not hard to work out which one I&#039;d rather give up.)
Any way my daughter has one, and no problems, no pills to remember,and she is protected from unwanted pregnancies for three years.
(in fact our GP told my daughter they were 100% effective but they&#039;ve left a 0.1% margin for error in case)

But wait, how do we get them all to use birth control, many I’ve encountered spit chips at the mere mention of the idea. 

I know their are a number of people who can&#039;t use birth control for one reason or another. 

But is that true for all types of birth control, 
there are many different types to choose from, 

surely one to suite most every-one.

I would suggest that the number of people that can&#039;t use any of them at all would be very small 

but many use this as their reason.


If only people would choose to use birth control,

They wouldn&#039;t have to make another choice........

http://www.sexual-health-resource.org/hormonal_birth_control.htm




Cash payments for using birth control..............

http://serr8d.blogspot.com/2007/02/project-preventionthe-road-as-opposed.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abortion numbers are far too high…</p>
<p>Over 3,500 per day / Over 1.3 million per year in America alone. </p>
<p>50% of that 1.3 million claimed failed birth control was to blame. </p>
<p>A further 48% had failed to use any birth control at all. </p>
<p>And 2% had medical reasons. </p>
<p>That means a staggering 98% of unwanted pregnancies may have been avoided had an effective birth control been used.</p>
<p>There are an estimated 34 million women in need of contraceptive services in America — those who are not sterilized, pregnant or trying to conceive.</p>
<p>34 million…if the pill is 99% effective that means 1% of 34mill = 340,000 + 26,000 for the 2% = 366,000…………….</p>
<p>366,000 abortions per year..Doesn’t that sound better than 1.3 million…<br />
And it could be even less, some of the implants are 99.9% effective….<br />
0.1% of 34mill = 34,000 + 26,000 for the 2% = 60,000………WOW……..</p>
<p>1.3 million per year or 60,000 per year….</p>
<p>DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN GET AN IMPLANT (in arm)<br />
THAT IS SAFE, 99.9% EFFECTIVE AND LASTS FOR THREE YEARS?</p>
<p>Implanon is new to the US but has been widely used in Aus for about five years.<br />
The only bad report iv’e heard is if your a smoker you can’t use them due to increased risk of cardiovascular conditions.<br />
Good incentive to give the cigs a miss…………<br />
(not hard to work out which one I&#8217;d rather give up.)<br />
Any way my daughter has one, and no problems, no pills to remember,and she is protected from unwanted pregnancies for three years.<br />
(in fact our GP told my daughter they were 100% effective but they&#8217;ve left a 0.1% margin for error in case)</p>
<p>But wait, how do we get them all to use birth control, many I’ve encountered spit chips at the mere mention of the idea. </p>
<p>I know their are a number of people who can&#8217;t use birth control for one reason or another. </p>
<p>But is that true for all types of birth control,<br />
there are many different types to choose from, </p>
<p>surely one to suite most every-one.</p>
<p>I would suggest that the number of people that can&#8217;t use any of them at all would be very small </p>
<p>but many use this as their reason.</p>
<p>If only people would choose to use birth control,</p>
<p>They wouldn&#8217;t have to make another choice&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sexual-health-resource.org/hormonal_birth_control.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sexual-health-resource.org/hormonal_birth_control.htm</a></p>
<p>Cash payments for using birth control&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://serr8d.blogspot.com/2007/02/project-preventionthe-road-as-opposed.html" rel="nofollow">http://serr8d.blogspot.com/2007/02/project-preventionthe-road-as-opposed.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32638</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32638</guid>
		<description>I just checked out your website, and I can&#039;t tell you how strongly I disagree with your characterization that the pro-life position &quot;essentially turn[s] pregnant women into slaves.&quot;

On the other hand, I appreciate the fact that you acknowledge the horror of abortion, and that fetuses of a certain age feel pain as they are being aborted.  I do generally agree with you that legislation alone will not solve the problem (hence this post) and that persuasion is the best way to stop abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked out your website, and I can&#8217;t tell you how strongly I disagree with your characterization that the pro-life position &#8220;essentially turn[s] pregnant women into slaves.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, I appreciate the fact that you acknowledge the horror of abortion, and that fetuses of a certain age feel pain as they are being aborted.  I do generally agree with you that legislation alone will not solve the problem (hence this post) and that persuasion is the best way to stop abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32633</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32633</guid>
		<description>Scott, you&#039;re missing the point.  How about if we feed those children instead of just killing others?  That&#039;s why I&#039;m a Compassion sponsor and help support an orphanage in Mexico.  And since what you&#039;re talking about is not a problem in the US, (which is clearly what I was talking about, since Dred Scott and the Roe and Doe cases do not apply to other countries) what if we encourage people in those countries to get rid of the corruption and dictatorships that so often lead to famine?

I&#039;d also like to note that only 23% of women in the US report that &quot;Can&#039;t afford a baby now&quot; is the reason they get an abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, you&#8217;re missing the point.  How about if we feed those children instead of just killing others?  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m a Compassion sponsor and help support an orphanage in Mexico.  And since what you&#8217;re talking about is not a problem in the US, (which is clearly what I was talking about, since Dred Scott and the Roe and Doe cases do not apply to other countries) what if we encourage people in those countries to get rid of the corruption and dictatorships that so often lead to famine?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to note that only 23% of women in the US report that &#8220;Can&#8217;t afford a baby now&#8221; is the reason they get an abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hughes</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/dred-scott-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-32630</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/03/06/dred-scott-and-abortion/#comment-32630</guid>
		<description>Well, Supreme Court rulings can be overturned; I agree.

However, with 18,000 children dying form hunger every day; I think it&#039;s wise to give potential mothers the choice to not bring another thinking, feeling person into this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Supreme Court rulings can be overturned; I agree.</p>
<p>However, with 18,000 children dying form hunger every day; I think it&#8217;s wise to give potential mothers the choice to not bring another thinking, feeling person into this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
