http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/ pursuing holiness, following politics Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:04:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/comment-page-1/#comment-38450   Going After The Leakers - Pursuing Holiness Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:56:57 +0000 http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/19/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/#comment-38450 [...] Diaz, who leaked information about Gitmo, later regretted it in spite of the light penalty he received. “I could have gone to the chief of staff, I could have gone to the IG (inspector general),” [...] [...] Diaz, who leaked information about Gitmo, later regretted it in spite of the light penalty he received. “I could have gone to the chief of staff, I could have gone to the IG (inspector general),” [...]

]]> http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/comment-page-1/#comment-35727 Pursuing Holiness » Blog Archive » The Difference Between Whistleblowers and Leakers Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:46:56 +0000 http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/19/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/#comment-35727 [...] Leaker Matt Diaz tried to take the easy way out, and later admitted regretfully: “I could have gone to the chief of staff, I could have gone to the IG (inspector general),” or to his commanding officers in Guantanamo, Diaz said. “There were a lot of better ways to do this, and I didn’t take those better ways.” [...] [...] Leaker Matt Diaz tried to take the easy way out, and later admitted regretfully: “I could have gone to the chief of staff, I could have gone to the IG (inspector general),” or to his commanding officers in Guantanamo, Diaz said. “There were a lot of better ways to do this, and I didn’t take those better ways.” [...]

]]> http://pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/comment-page-1/#comment-35404 Stanford Matthews Sat, 19 May 2007 18:37:37 +0000 http://www.pursuingholiness.com/2007/05/19/gitmo-leaker-gets-six-months/#comment-35404 This case, the NYT's and many more 'classified leaks' with little in the way of punishment suggest too many people do not view 'classified' as a necessary protection. Where is the responsibility part of exercising freedom in America? As in, just because you can, doesn't mean you should. This case, the NYT’s and many more ‘classified leaks’ with little in the way of punishment suggest too many people do not view ‘classified’ as a necessary protection. Where is the responsibility part of exercising freedom in America? As in, just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

]]>