Right on time - here comes the global cooling crisis!
June 21, 2007 by Laura | Trackback URI
Here comes the new climate crisis, right on time: Global cooling. I knew that when the media could no longer sustain the warming hype, they would do exactly what they did last time - switch to cooling. And courtesy of Bob Parks at Black and Right, here’s the first article this century on that very topic. It won’t be the last. There will be more and more, until a “consensus” is reached, and all this global warming hype of the last two decades will go right down the memory hole. On the bright side, I can buy that Hummer with a clear conscience, knowing I’m doing my part to save the planet.
Forget warming - beware the new ice age
In the 1970s, leading scientists claimed that the world was threatened by an era of global cooling.Based on what we’ve learned this decade, says George Kukla, those scientists - and he was among them — had it right. The world is about to enter another Ice Age.
… Many today speak with derision of the 1970s global-cooling scare, seeing it as a cautionary false alarm. Others see it as an embarrassment — Newsweek magazine, which published a 1975 article entitled “The Cooling World,” even corrected the record with a 2006 follow-up to its 1975 article arguing that scientists now have it right.
Dr. Kukla sees it — and the 1975 Newsweek article — differently. Although the magazine article indicated that the cooling trend would be continuous, scientists knew otherwise. “None of us expected uninterrupted continuation of the trend,” he states. Moreover, thanks to new evidence that Dr. Kukla only recently published, he now knows that global warming always precedes an ice age.
Just one example of the doom and gloom we’ll be forgetting about in light of this new crisis: the Guardian’s science editor Ian Sample included the following quotes in this 2005 article, Warming hits ‘tipping point’,
“If we don’t take action very soon, we could unleash runaway global warming that will be beyond our control and it will lead to social, economic and environmental devastation worldwide,” he said. “There’s still time to take action, but not much.
“The assumption has been that we wouldn’t see these kinds of changes until the world is a little warmer, but this suggests we’re running out of time.”
Very convenient. Right before all those terrible consequences of global warming were about to kick in, we have an entirely different crisis to busy our little minds. Thousands of articles, chock full of those types of quotes… millions of dollars spent crafting Kyoto and pushing it on a largely unwilling populace. And we’ll never see an apology from Mr. Sample or any of the hundreds of media scaremongers just like him.
I guess 112 years of this nonsense wasn’t enough - we’re going to have to go through a few more cycles before the media is held accountable. As the article points out,
Some in the media would probably argue that they merely report what scientists tell them, but that would be only half true.
Journalists decide not only what they cover; they also decide whether to include opposing viewpoints. That’s a balance lacking in the current “debate.”
This isn’t a question of science. It’s a question of whether Americans can trust what the media tell them about science.
But do note the fact that no matter what the climate problem is, the solution is always more government intervention. Give it a few months and we’ll see articles about how the government is going to save us from this crisis - they just need a little more power and a little more tax money.
UPDATE: Don’t miss this post on the new Global Warming/Global Cooling category, with scary global warming video from the 1950s. Who knew An Inconvenient Truth was a remake of a Disney Disney-style show?
Others taking note of this development: Powerline, Newsbusters, Sister Toldjah, The Jawa Report
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson’s Website, A Blog For All, DeMediacratic Nation, Right Truth, Maggie’s Notebook, Jeanette’s Celebrity Corner, Shadowscope, The Pet Haven Blog, Webloggin, Cao’s Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Jo’s Cafe, Conservative Cat, third world county, Right Celebrity, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Nuke’s news and views, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.




But how can this be! The BBC and the al-Guardian here in the UK are convinced we are all frying - and that George W. is somehow behind it (which must be true as he’s a Christian and they are destroyign the world).
And, when I watched al-Gore’s amazing powerpoint presentation, my ice cream did seem to melt faster than in former years…for me this is all conclusive proof of warming. Now where’s that sweater…?
Relax, Bush is at fault for this too. I don’t know exactly how yet, but I’m quite sure that he is.
I’m waiting for the inevitable war… When half of the world is so alarmed by global warming that they need taxes and government intervention to prevent it and the other half is so alarmed by global cooling that they need taxes and government intervention to prevent it. Once we reach that stage there will be conflict.
Of course since we’re dealing with governments and NGOs that want to get a slice of the government pie nobody will think of the obvious solution to the problem. If global warming is going to destroy the planet and global cooling is going to destroy the planet maybe its best to do nothing about either and let them cancel each other out.
Or maybe an even better idea would be to admit that climate changes in a cyclical fashion and that it has nothing to do with mankind’s influence. But that wouldn’t be an excuse for more taxation or restrictions on economic development would it?
I’d love to see the debates that situation would create - but the last few times they’ve switched from one climate scare to the other, it was with a whimper, not a bang. The media (Ministry of Truth) makes it nearly seamless.