I’ve been slow to post on this because it’s an emotional issue for me, both as a war supporter and as someone who was diagnosed with PTSD and dissociative disorder many years ago. Henry Neufeld has two posts about PTSS/PTSD and how the military may be treating – or NOT treating – troops who have them.
It was the responsibility of the military to learn about any issues this young man may have had back in boot camp and during his advanced training. Once they sent him to Iraq, as far as I’m concerned the warranty ran out; they “own” that soldier and should be responsible for keeping him in good condition. And even if he did have a previously undiscovered pre-existing condition, it is safe to say that the job of picking up body parts in a war zone will have exacerbated it. That said, I’ll wait for more information before I condemn the military on this one. (Never let it be said that I can’t be taught.) If this story is accurate, there will be a LOT more information coming out – as there should be.
Henry also points out in a related post,
Well, Newsweek has been wrong before; one notable example is the infamous Koran flushing story. But I’ll reserve comment pending further information except to say – a LOT of predictions about Iraq have been wrong, not just the cost of the war. Furthermore, Linda Bilmes, who made that estimate, is more than just a policy analyst. Given that she characterized Abu Ghraib as “the systematic violation of human rights practiced or permitted by authorities of the United States within occupied Iraq” I’m unwilling to take her at face value as a neutral source. More research is in order, and I don’t just mean this facile dismissal.
I completely agree with Henry when he writes,
I believe people from all across the political spectrum should be able to agree that we must take good care of our troops and our veterans.
This is an area that we all, whether we support the war or not, need to be diligent about – if it’s happening, we need to put a stop to it. Our troops deserve the best, and it’s our job to ensure they get it. I’m going to be researching what bills are out there with regard to funding health care for the troops, and if I find anything worthwhile, I’ll post it so we can all encourage our Congressional representation to support it.
For more information on PTSD, this Pentagon channel (I originally linked to it in April) is very interesting and there’s a good discussion on follow up for PTSD about ten minutes into the video:
The Pentagon Channel:
The Wounds Within
RECON
Exploring the debilitating condition of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. You’ll meet servicemembers whose physical battlefield injuries have healed, but yet emotional wounds linger on.


Just so! And one should also note that estimates of this type are notoriously difficult to get right even if one is not trying to produce statistics to support one’s biases.
One always has to divide a news story into “alleged facts” that can be verified or falsified easily; estimates and extrapolations, which are much harder to track down and verify and questionable even then; and opinions, which are a dime a dozen.
Even “alleged” facts are pretty scarce.
Agreed – I’m unwilling to just lump her in with the Code Pinkers, I’m just reserving some skepticism. That Heritage commentary at the link was in my opinion a very weak argument to dismiss her. It contained highly truncated quotes, which is a red flag. I need to take the time to read the whole paper at some point, but in the meantime I wanted to make the point that even if Schmidt DID have a pre-existing condition, I still think it’s wrong for the Army to kick him loose after two tours. Kick him loose in boot camp, certainly – but not after two tours. If there is anything to that charge, I think someone’s head should roll.
I really appreciated your posts on this – it’s such an important topic.