Comments on: Conservatives for Hillary? – updated

By: Taking Our Lumps Now or Later? » Pursuing Holiness

Taking Our Lumps Now or Later? » Pursuing Holiness — Thu, 15 May 2008 20:09:36 +0000

[...] while he associates with “La Raza” – and gives them millions of our tax dollars; and the long, long list of things he’s thumbed his nose at us over for many [...]

By: Thresher

Thresher — Fri, 09 May 2008 22:18:50 +0000

I oppose McCain because he has the best chance of unleashing an irreversible change to the population of voters that will render impossible most future conservative victories at the polls.

Once McCain grants citizenship to 20 million illegal aliens both parties will pander to these new voters and compete to give them what they want, including letting them bring in their families from Mexico or South America. The result will be at least 50 million uneducated, inassimilable poor people who may well be “good-hearted” but will also be drains on our social services. They will vote for whichever politician will redistribute the greatest amount of tax money to them. We will lose any security on our Southern border, our American culture, and we will become a socialist nation. Irreversibly.

Clinton or Obama can not do as much permanent damage, if we successfully stop the amnesty that would swamp the votes of Republicans and conservatives. For example, if Obama or Clinton appoints leftist Supreme Court Justices, then Republican and conservative voters retain the possibility of restricting the jurisdiction of the Court. If they launch a socialist national health care program, then Republican and conservative voters retain the possibility of ending the program later. These battles may be very hard, but we retain the possibility of winning. But if we give citizenship to 20 million illegal aliens and let them bring in their families, there never again will be enough conservative voters to pass conservatives policies, except perhaps for more restrictions on abortion.

In summary, I oppose McCain because he has the best chance of achieving a demographic coup d’etat that will permanently overwhelm conservative voters.

I admire the service and sacrifice in his youth. But when I vote, I’ll write in Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter for President.

By: Laura

Laura — Fri, 09 May 2008 04:56:38 +0000

He’ll live long enough to open the borders wide, and Congress (except for a small handful of people) will trip all over themselves helping him do it.

By: Oblogatory Anecdotes - Hillary Eyes 2012

Oblogatory Anecdotes - Hillary Eyes 2012 — Wed, 07 May 2008 21:31:25 +0000

Hillary Eyes 2012…

She cannot let him win because that would in fact be the final stake through the heart of the Clinton political machine. Her only chance is to damage him during the primary and let McCain finish off the remains in the general election and she may eve…..

By: PRCalDude

PRCalDude — Wed, 07 May 2008 15:23:19 +0000

Murphy’s law suggests he’ll survive two full terms. Just look at Cheney. If they can keep him alive, they keep anyone alive.

By: Drew

Drew — Wed, 07 May 2008 05:48:35 +0000

Look on the bright side. Maybe he’ll pick a good running mate and then die of a heart attack.

By: PRCalDude

PRCalDude — Wed, 07 May 2008 05:19:00 +0000

For me, the most compelling reason was the McCain-Kennedy amnesty. I jus can’t seem to see the sense in going to war overseas as Bush and McCain have and will have us do if we’re to just let Islamic savages from all over the world come and settle next door. I also don’t believe the “Hispanic family values” lie after too many personal experiences.

I’m a single issue voter, I guess. I suppose the next president will pass some amnesty, and then it’s bye-bye America. At least I won’t bring a rope to my own hanging by voting for THE AUTHOR of the amnesty.