« Quote of the Day | Home | Soldiers assaulted on the DC Metro? Not so much… »

Shocka: The UN Does Something Useful

May 23, 2008 by Laura | Trackback URI

I’d say “Good on them,” but my second thought upon reading this news was, “Of course! Those people (and goats) aren’t going to just rape themselves, you know! That explains why they sent the condoms.”   But in all fairness, the agreement reached was for “all aid workers” to help, and there’s no word at this point of a Peacekeeper force being sent in.  So a qualified thumbs-up for the UN.

Comments

5 Responses to “Shocka: The UN Does Something Useful”

  1. Dr.D on May 25th, 2008 4:37 pm

    Did you notice that it was Jordanian (presumably muzlim) military men who were after the goats?

    Why should we be surprised at this? It fits the pattern set down by big Mo himself. Pedophilia and bestiality, the sorts of things that we can expect from muzlim men who have no sense of sexual self control.

    To those who would say that “all religions are the same,” please take note that this is a clear instance where they are not the same. Christian men do not do such things. They are forbidden in the Bible, and Christian men are bound by the law of God.

  2. Laura on May 26th, 2008 12:23 pm

    Dr. D., people are into bestiality here in the US as well. You’d be surprised (well, I am, anyway) at the number of search engine porn referrals I get, and what’s in the search strings is often quite shocking. And from US IPs.

    I’m curious – what’s the point of misspelling Muslim and lower-casing it? I’ve notice a handful of people doing that and I can’t figure out what the point is.

  3. Dr.D on May 26th, 2008 8:59 pm

    The point of writing muzlim is to show my deliberate disdain for izlam. It is a political organization pretending to be a religion.

  4. Laura on May 26th, 2008 9:35 pm

    If it makes you feel better…

  5. Brian Gabriel on May 27th, 2008 3:40 am

    Where Dr. D is concerned,
    I have to agree with him (or her), that islam is a political, and not a religious movement. However, if you want to play the mystical end, I totally believe that mohammed is “the false prophet” alluded to in the “Book of Revelation.” How could it be otherwise, when you look at all the facts? Mohammed is an evil man who twisted the tenets of Christianity and Judaism to his own ends. But one question must be asked. That is, all prophets have been Jews. How is it that mohammed is considered a prophet, in spite of the fact that he’s not a Jew? A son of Hagar, yes, but not a Jew.
    Brian G.

  • RSS My Twitter

  • Recent Posts