It’s got an “OFF” button, doesn’t it?

Stories like this drive me insane. The Parents Television Council did a study that revealed that television glamorizes out of wedlock, kinky sex, sex toys, voyeurism, sadomasochistic sex, and porn. But that’s not the insanity-making part:

The effect on young viewers is dire, the Parents Television Council contends.

Behavior that once was seen as “fringe, immoral or socially destructive have been given the imprimatur of acceptability by the television industry” and children are absorbing or even imitating it, the report contends.

Parents don’t necessarily have the tools to identify programs they may want to block via the V-chip, according to the study: It says designations such as “S,” signaling sexual content, were applied inconsistently and inaccurately.

Hey, here’s an idea! See these red buttons? Find the one like it on your remote control and press it!

Problem solved. The idea that parents don’t have the tools to prevent their children from seeing offensive content is just enraging. Where are the adults in this country?  The idea that the V-chip is their children’s only defense is ridiculous.  How about spending the evening with their children watching TV together?  How about taking the televisions out of their children’s bedrooms?  How about investing the time to learn what shows are acceptable and planning their TV viewing accordingly?  I guess for some people personal responsibility is just too hard; so let’s try to get somebody else to take care of us!

The reality is that the networks, producers, actors, and everybody else involved are going to continue this trend until they stop making money at it. It’s that simple. The solution to stopping this sort of thing is to stop watching it, already.

But people won’t, of course. The reason they show this stuff is that people want to see it. Parents want to see it, and parents don’t want to make the effort to protect their children from it.

Stuff that “Skinemax” used to consider risque is now broadcast over the airwaves at 9pm.  It’s going to continue to get worse.  Canada shows softcore porn on broadcast TV after midnight.  Earlier this year the 1972 porn movie Deep Throat was shown on Dutch broadcast TV. The Dutch included it as part of a “larger discussion” about pornography. Look for a similar setup on PBS sometime over the next few years. That’s not an “if,” it’s a “when.”  Given what is acceptable content on shows like Nip/Tuck, do you really think American broadcast TV will be far behind?

From an older post of mine:

research shows that the more porn people watch, the lower their standards for protecting children.

Dr. Mary Ann Layden, co-director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the University of Pennsylvania, tells of one study in which people were asked various questions before and after watching quantities of porn.

One question was whether we should restrict children’s access to XXX-rated material. Post-porn, the number of people answering “yes” was reduced by half.

Here’s what we were willing to accept in 2005:

Yet as recently as 1972, George Carlin was arrested for disturbing the peace with his “seven dirty words” and the idea of showing as much nudity and sex as we do now could not have been contemplated in those days.  Steven Bochco and his ilk wanted to push the envelope – well, they’ve pushed it.  And people want it pushed, or they’d have rebuked him by turning off their televisions years ago.

Parents, especially Christian parents, are certainly free to kick and scream about this trend.  Write letters, sign petitions, just knock yourselves out.  You’re not going to get anywhere, but if it makes you feel better, go on ahead.  But while you’re doing that, locate that red button and use it.  Because nobody, including the Parents Television Council and the AFA, is going to protect your children but you.

About Laura

Comments

  1. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! I thought I was the only parent in America that knew where the Power button was and how to use it. I realize my daughter is only 2 1/2. So, maybe it’s easier to say these things now, but (and that’s a big but) we let her watch a total of maybe a half hour of TV per week. Usually, that consists of a VeggieTales video, Baby Einstein or a slideshow of family pictures set to music that I put together for her birthday each year. We did make one exception to the 1/2 hour rule recently when we took a rather long road trip, and she was trapped in a car seat for hours on end with nothing to do.

    We decided before we ever had children that they will never have TVs in their rooms. We discuss what we watch with our daughter, so she understands that those images mean something. I may catch some flack for this, but to me, it is just lazy parenting to sit your kid in front of a TV for hours so they will be “occupied.” It may take me longer to get my house clean, dinner cooked, or some other project accomplished, but I think it’s important for my little one to realize that TV is a treat that happens once in a while – not a right that she is owed.

    In any case, we keep fun music going most of the time, which has instilled a love of music, singing, etc. She loves, loves, loves books, and will sit and “read” to herself for long periods of time. We actually sit down as a family and play games and read. It’s amazing how many other things you find to do when the the TV is off.

  2. Laura says:

    That’s great that you limit the TV time so severely – although studies are ongoing, there is a correlation – not necessarily a cause – between TV for young children and autism: http://www.slate.com/id/2151538/

    But until they can prove it one way or another, there’s certainly no harm, and a whole lot of benefits, in limiting the tube time.

    I wish we had been more diligent about it when my daughter was younger.

  3. Larry B says:

    Hi Laura – found this blog from a link at Henry Neufelds blog.

    I used to feel the same as you have posted here, but as my kids have grown up and we interact with more and more people in our community, it’s obvious to me that in a lot of situations, there isn’t anyone to control what is broadcast in the home and that some level of protection for children isn’t necessarily a bad thing. While we can raise our own children protected from the filth on TV, we are leaving them a society that is arguably worse and to me that is something we should take responsibility for also. Just because people want to consume porn doesn’t mean we can’t take efforts to restrict it’s usage to reduce the level of harm it causes to society in general.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] blogged a couple of days ago about redistribution of wealth, and then I read this post at Pursuing Holiness that discusses [...]