<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why conservatives can&#8217;t stand McCain, part 4,389.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/</link>
	<description>pursuing holiness, following politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/comment-page-1/#comment-47726</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pursuingholiness.com/?p=3329#comment-47726</guid>
		<description>Sadly, Laura&#039;s list is all too factually correct. I was a Fredhead myself, then Romney. McCain is a nice man, but, not having any real principles other than an admirable honor, he does not ignite the conservatives. That said, it is a hold your nose situation to vote for him; of course Palin makes the political dish way more palatable. 
     Problem is, whatever was going on with McCain before the last few weeks has been made incoherent by the events in the financial markets. I am no Greenspan, so I cannot make any lofty pronouncements, but we see that when the grownups like (whether you agree with him or not) Paulson and company, do big big stuff on the financial markets, it is always easy for the demagogues like BHO and his minions, to appeal as they do to the &quot;middle class&quot;. 
     Heck, I am in the middle class I guess, but I just have a hard time with Obama and his focus group tested soundbites. I just hope McCain can get traction, and we can keep ACORN from stealing the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, Laura&#8217;s list is all too factually correct. I was a Fredhead myself, then Romney. McCain is a nice man, but, not having any real principles other than an admirable honor, he does not ignite the conservatives. That said, it is a hold your nose situation to vote for him; of course Palin makes the political dish way more palatable.<br />
     Problem is, whatever was going on with McCain before the last few weeks has been made incoherent by the events in the financial markets. I am no Greenspan, so I cannot make any lofty pronouncements, but we see that when the grownups like (whether you agree with him or not) Paulson and company, do big big stuff on the financial markets, it is always easy for the demagogues like BHO and his minions, to appeal as they do to the &#8220;middle class&#8221;.<br />
     Heck, I am in the middle class I guess, but I just have a hard time with Obama and his focus group tested soundbites. I just hope McCain can get traction, and we can keep ACORN from stealing the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/comment-page-1/#comment-47712</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pursuingholiness.com/?p=3329#comment-47712</guid>
		<description>No, Tom, just engaging in a bit of schadenfreude.  &quot;The party&quot; insisted that we needed to move further left in order to win, and while I still obviously want McCain to win over Obama, I think it&#039;s really funny that all the best arguments against Obama are out of bounds because they apply at least in part to McCain as well.

Even the &quot;Reverend&quot; Wright argument - which McCain refuses to use anyway - would have been negated to some extent by the separatist La Raza supporters McCain has for campaign advisors.  Yummy schadenfreude - except for the bitter aftertaste, of course; the problem with this election is either Obama or McCain is going to win it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Tom, just engaging in a bit of schadenfreude.  &#8220;The party&#8221; insisted that we needed to move further left in order to win, and while I still obviously want McCain to win over Obama, I think it&#8217;s really funny that all the best arguments against Obama are out of bounds because they apply at least in part to McCain as well.</p>
<p>Even the &#8220;Reverend&#8221; Wright argument &#8211; which McCain refuses to use anyway &#8211; would have been negated to some extent by the separatist La Raza supporters McCain has for campaign advisors.  Yummy schadenfreude &#8211; except for the bitter aftertaste, of course; the problem with this election is either Obama or McCain is going to win it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/comment-page-1/#comment-47710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pursuingholiness.com/?p=3329#comment-47710</guid>
		<description>Laura: I heard some mumbling in here... it seems this theater has been closed for a long time. Do you need someone to help you find your way out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura: I heard some mumbling in here&#8230; it seems this theater has been closed for a long time. Do you need someone to help you find your way out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/comment-page-1/#comment-47693</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pursuingholiness.com/?p=3329#comment-47693</guid>
		<description>Here, Drew, read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa521.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  It was Cato, not NRO.  But even without that comprehensive report, the common sense argument should be considered.  We all agree that the United States - one way or another - is paying the bulk of the cost of drug research and development.  If we stop paying it, by reimporting drugs at lower prices, then no one will be paying for research and development.  And consequently research and development will stop.  The correct solution is not for us to kowtow to socialist medicine, but instead to demand that they enter the free market - which will lower the prices here AND provide for future drug technology.

I watched him tapdance his way around global warming.  He believes wholeheartedly that it&#039;s a manmade problem and in cap and trade; a ridiculous solution in any event that will largely serve to enrich Al Gore.  The trouble is, science is increasingly showing that a) it&#039;s no longer warming, b) that big, burning ball of gas in the sky has a lot to do with the temperature, and c) our measurement system is totally screwed up - read Watts Up With That to see the problems with the temperature stations.  Another few years and we&#039;ll be neck deep in another &quot;global cooling&quot; scare like we have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;several times before&lt;/a&gt;.  

I&#039;m still voting for him, but certainly not wholeheartedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, Drew, read <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa521.pdf" rel="nofollow">this</a>.  It was Cato, not NRO.  But even without that comprehensive report, the common sense argument should be considered.  We all agree that the United States &#8211; one way or another &#8211; is paying the bulk of the cost of drug research and development.  If we stop paying it, by reimporting drugs at lower prices, then no one will be paying for research and development.  And consequently research and development will stop.  The correct solution is not for us to kowtow to socialist medicine, but instead to demand that they enter the free market &#8211; which will lower the prices here AND provide for future drug technology.</p>
<p>I watched him tapdance his way around global warming.  He believes wholeheartedly that it&#8217;s a manmade problem and in cap and trade; a ridiculous solution in any event that will largely serve to enrich Al Gore.  The trouble is, science is increasingly showing that a) it&#8217;s no longer warming, b) that big, burning ball of gas in the sky has a lot to do with the temperature, and c) our measurement system is totally screwed up &#8211; read Watts Up With That to see the problems with the temperature stations.  Another few years and we&#8217;ll be neck deep in another &#8220;global cooling&#8221; scare like we have been <a href="http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice.asp" rel="nofollow">several times before</a>.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still voting for him, but certainly not wholeheartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://pursuingholiness.com/2008/10/why-conservatives-cant-stand-mccain-part-4389/comment-page-1/#comment-47691</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pursuingholiness.com/?p=3329#comment-47691</guid>
		<description>A few objections:

1. It seems like this drug plan would merely allow our citizens access to the tax-subsidized drugs of foreign countries. The foreign governments would still have to pay our drug companies whatever they asked for to buy them, and then our consumers could re-import them cheaply.

3. McCain has flip-flopped on the issue of amnesty due to popular opinion.

10. If you watched the second debate, he seems to have abandoned the smokestack tax idea (at least as long as the economy remains down). When the lady asked him about global warming, he mentioned his past McCain-Lieberman bill -- but &lt;em&gt;emphasized&lt;/em&gt; that his current solution would be to promote nuclear power. He has said that raising taxes during a recession would be suicide.


And ultimately, McCain has sacrificed a good number of liberal votes by picking Sarah Palin, so I think the least we can do is support him wholeheartedly. That, and he&#039;s old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few objections:</p>
<p>1. It seems like this drug plan would merely allow our citizens access to the tax-subsidized drugs of foreign countries. The foreign governments would still have to pay our drug companies whatever they asked for to buy them, and then our consumers could re-import them cheaply.</p>
<p>3. McCain has flip-flopped on the issue of amnesty due to popular opinion.</p>
<p>10. If you watched the second debate, he seems to have abandoned the smokestack tax idea (at least as long as the economy remains down). When the lady asked him about global warming, he mentioned his past McCain-Lieberman bill &#8212; but <em>emphasized</em> that his current solution would be to promote nuclear power. He has said that raising taxes during a recession would be suicide.</p>
<p>And ultimately, McCain has sacrificed a good number of liberal votes by picking Sarah Palin, so I think the least we can do is support him wholeheartedly. That, and he&#8217;s old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
