Obama: Putting the Bully in ‘Bully Pulpit’

Pundits who follow middle east news were saying even before the election that once Obama’s appeasement failed to effectively engage Iran and other thugocracies, that he would turn his attention to bullying Israel.  And so he has.  His recent – and shockingly disingenuous, even for him – interest in Jerusalem real estate is the most recent example.

Issues in which Obama apparently has no interest:

  • Islamic child marriages
  • Gays being executed in Iran
  • Women being stoned or whipped for the crime of having been raped
  • Palestinian rocket attacks against Israel
  • Palestinian desecration of Jewish holy sites
  • Gilad Shalit
  • the non-massacre at Jenin
  • Palestinian television shows for children that glamorize suicide bombing
  • Pallywood propaganda that would make Leni Riefenstahl blush

I could go on, but… you get the idea.  All of those things are less important to him than the entirely legal and normal construction of some apartments in Jerusalem.

Like water, bullies follow the course of least resistance.  When the Islamic thugocracies thumbed their noses at Obama, he turned to Israel as a more attractive target.  Here’s hoping Bibi Netanyahu chooses to stand his ground, both rhetorically and literally.

Stupid is as stupid does, Mr. Hanks.

Yes, that title is pretty low-hanging fruit, but I couldn’t resist after Tom Hanks said this:

Back in World War II, we viewed the Japanese as ‘yellow, slant-eyed dogs’ that believed in different gods. They were out to kill us because our way of living was different. We, in turn, wanted to annihilate them because they were different. Does that sound familiar, by any chance, to what’s going on today?

Since he’s asking, I’ll answer. No, it doesn’t sound like what’s going on today.  Nor is that a particularly fair or accurate description of what started WWII.  But as for the circumstances today,  “they” – in this case, radical Islamists – are out to kill us because our way of living is different.  We choose, aside from far too many appeasers, not to submit to Islam.  The ultimate remedy for that according to the Quran is to kill us, and a fair few of these Muslims are walking out their faith accordingly.  We, on the other hand, are not trying to annihilate them because they’re different.  We’re not even trying to annihilate them, really – the current rules of engagement disprove that theory pretty conclusively.  But we are returning fire against those who are making war against us, as one group after another has done in one fashion or another since 1979.   It’s very perplexing why the left objects to that.

Still working…

Friday is “Tiger Day” at the base where my son in law is completing his training before being deployed to Iraq next week.  So I’m working to get ahead, so I can take Thursday and Friday off.  I finally opened my RSS reader to catch up a bit on what I’ve been missing, and I’m profoundly depressed.  A barbaric attack (by Muslims, natch) on a town in the Phillipines – 13 dead.  It just baffles me how people tolerate the “religion of peace” whitewashing by the press and our political leaders, even while textbooks from our erstwhile ally, Saudi Arabia, spread the hate here in the west.  Of a billion or so Muslims, of course most would not dream of conducting a terror attack.  But many do give to charities that support terror – why aren’t they conducting the same kind of due diligence I do, before I give?  And my biggest concern is some scam artist uses up on the money on “administration costs,” not that he will use it to kill people.  Their denial is very tiresome. Are all these peaceful Muslims terrified of a mere handful of radicals?  Or do they agree, but lack the nerve to act on their beliefs?

Even the “tiny percentage” the media likes to point out every time a poll shows that “only” x number of Muslims polled support terrorism still numbers in the millions.  The most recent study I’ve seen was 7% – which maths out to about 91 million terror supporters.  I’ll repost most of what I wrote last year below the fold – even reduced down to people who are willing and able to conduct a terror act, it’s still a dangerously high number.  And they all have people in their lives – family, friends, or coworkers – know who they are and fail to report them. [Read more...]

One. More. Time.

I’ve linked this before – heck, everybody on the right’s linked it before. But it’s a slow news day and it’s also worth remembering, in light of the KSM trial, Iran’s nuclear announcement. Will anyone deny their intentions at this point or maintain the theory that an “open hand” is going to be helpful? Puhleeze. Obama’s done everything but kiss Ahmadinejad’s butt in the WTC pit, and he’s still being rhetorically slapped around by A’jad and burned in effigy by crowds. Anybody who is surprised by this Carter administration replay needs a good kick in the pants.  Because on many, many occasions, President Obama was crystal clear about his intentions with regard to security issues. Now he’s trying to take credit for Iraq, which is disgraceful after he and the rest of the Democrats – well, Liebs certainly earned a pass on that one – did their level best to Vietnamize it. The dog that didn’t bark: not one mention of Iran in this checklist of Obama’s deep, sincere concerns about our security situation.

Religious History and Wars – The Animated Map

I’ve seen this before, but since I just linked it in the comments in response to a Crusades misconception, I thought I’d repost it here as well. Enjoy!

Where is the Moslem Aid to Haiti?

Hmmm. The largest emergency field hospital operating in Port au Prince is run by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). “It has a staff of over 40 doctors, with different specialists, nurses, paramedics and features a maternity ward, ICU, pediatrics unit, internal medicine department, a pharmacy, and operating rooms. The hospital can treat up to 500 patients a day.”

Where is the millions of dollars of aid from the oil-rich Islamic countries? Anyone? Anyone? Could it be that islam doesn’t care for distressed infidels, while the West (and Israel) bend over backward to bring aid and comfort?

By their works you shall know them.’ Indeed.

(HT: Weasel Zippers)

Radical Religious Terrorists

Finally, someone’s calling out the radicals, and high time, too.

You messed with the wrong Lucky Dog vendor!

You can't handle the truth!

You can't handle the truth!

A French Quarter armed robber can’t handle the truth:

Roy Lee Gant, a Lucky Dog vendor in the French Quarter, may look like an easy mark for an armed robber.

He wears a candy-cane-striped button-up shirt. He wheels around sausage and condiments to sell in a 1,200-pound cart shaped like a ballpark wiener, opting to make ends meet in the manner of Ignatius J. Reilly in “A Confederacy of Dunces.”

None of that oozes toughness. But Gant is a former U.S. Marine, trained in hand-to-hand combat. [Read more...]