Hard Pivots

Unlike Obama’s “hard pivot” to finally focus on the jobs Americans don’t have, my life has taken a hard pivot toward my mom’s medical situation and adding space to my house that she can life in.  I’ll be out again today – today’s morning medical fun includes a nerve conduction study.  In the afternoon, we have two contractor meetings.

Foxfier’s musings on time travel reminded me of my favorite Dan Simmons short and the hard pivot we have yet to take in how we view the war.

Wintery Knight has a couple of posts on Stephen Hawking’s latest, and Drew notes the music scene seems to be taking a hard pivot to the past.  As noted in Ecclesiastes, there is no new thing under the sun…

Henry links to an interesting image about cultural burdens.  What amused me most was the bizarre combinations of symbols on the children’s backpacks.  I assume that’s part of the point – that they conflict.  Maybe I’m not that observant… I just don’t see a lot of that in real life.  Still, food for thought.

Finally, I found this color video of Winston Churchill in 1941 fascinating, especially given that I’m still reading  his 6 volume WWII memoir.  (The abridged version would certainly be a faster read, though…) That was one seriously hard pivot British society took when Churchill ascended to Prime Minister.  (And his relationship with Chamberlain, whom he’d spent a decade bitterly opposing, was surprising cordial.)  In spite of the fact that I’m really enjoying the books, it’s taking me forever to finish because I’m also reading several other books.  (John Piper’s Finally Alive, re-reading Paul Miller’s A Praying Life, Jack Bickham’s Scene & Structure, and yes, I’ll admit it – the Twilight Saga.)  I tend to read whichever one I’m carrying at the moment, or whichever one is in the room I’m in at the time.  I keep thinking of getting a kindle, but until my library has a way to interface with it, I’ll hold out.

Weary

My husband and I had an odd conversation on the way to church this morning.  I said I sometimes wish we could be killed in a car accident rather than carry on living.  Thankfully, we’ve been married long enough, and he knows me well enough, not to take a statement like that as a personal indictment.  I’m one of the most blessed people you may ever know.  I have everything I need, and quite a lot of what I want.  I have a fantastic husband, a wonderful daughter and son in law, a home I enjoy, a church family I love dearly and satisfying work to do.  And pretty decent health, to boot.  I’m hardly suicidal.  And I knew that he wasn’t either, though he did agree with me that he sometimes feels the same way.  We’re just weary of our own sin.

Many people think I’m a nice person.  (Fools!  I know what’s in my heart.  Nice?  Hardly.)  Some people think we’re generous with our time and money.  (We know how much better we could be doing as stewards of what God has entrusted to us.)  I’m thankful for the fact that access to heaven is unrelated to my performance.  I know too well how far I fall short.  But the older I get, the more I’m looking forward to the rest of heaven.  Not rest from labor, but rest from myself.   Rest from my sinful nature.  Finally being able to put myself aside and really focus on God’s glory.  I’ve had a few samples of that here, usually during worship but sometimes in prayer, and I can’t help but anticipate the day when that’s the new normal.

CORRECTION: Hunt Downer voted AGAINST the Stelly tax.

In my Examiner post commenting on the La. 3rd District race, I incorrectly stated that Hunt Downer had supported the Stelly tax. In fact, his campaign just emailed me to let me know I was wrong about that. He voted against it. I’ve asked my editor at the Examiner to update the article with my correction and apology, but in the meantime, let me say here (where I can post the correction immediately myself) that I was wrong.

Hunt Downer voted against the Stelly tax, and a year after its passage, even proposed its repeal.

I am sorry for the error.

Renovations

I’ve got renovations on the brain, because we’re in the process of selecting a contractor to add a mother-in-law suite to our house.  At the same time, God’s renovations on me continue apace.

The home renovations are, I suspect, about to become a full time job for me.  I’ve mentioned before that we have a little house – about 1100 square feet.  We’ll convert a carport and patio to living space.  Before we can even start on that, we need to replace the fence we lost in Hurricane Katrina, so that any supplies and equipment we keep in the backyard are less likely to be stolen.  And we’ll need to build a shed to store the stuff currently in the carport. So there’s a lot of work to be done before we can really even get started.


The prep work for the renovations on me have included reading Paul Miller’s A Praying Life.  It’s been excellent. 

It’s not deep theology – while I heartily admire Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology, for example, it’s not exactly daily fare for me.  That’s attending a fascinating lecture, enjoyable, but also kind of hard work. A Praying Life is more like coffee and a chat with a friend. It brought to light a problem I didn’t even know I had – a lack of faith to pray for big things, for fear that if they don’t happen or I don’t get what I want, my belief in God would be diminished. I’m not sure how or when I drifted into that thought pattern, but it was a really appalling revelation. My mind knows that God is not a Cosmic Vending Machine, and that sometimes God says No, or Wait. That’s not a matter of a prayer not being answered. It’s a matter of me not getting the answer I want. But even knowing, acknowledging that fact, I still drifted into that thought pattern and my prayer life changed accordingly.

So now I’m starting to get back into the habit of praying for big things, and preparing myself to thank and worship God regardless of the answer. I’ll praise him if his answer is Yes, and I’ll praise him if it’s No, or Wait. I’ll trust him to work all things for my good, and trust him to lead me according to his purpose. If you care to join me – there’s a situation that seems hopeless to me, and I’ve hardly had the courage to pray about it. S. is trapped in an abusive situation. J. is the abuser. (And yes, S. has other places to go… but it’s complicated and not really bloggable.) I’ve seldom prayed about this, and when I did, I prayed that the law would catch up with J. so S. would be safe. That’s a reasonable, rational prayer… one that stands a chance of being answered, right? Nothing miraculous in that scenario. Not much, really, that even requires God’s intervention. Now… I’m not just praying for a resolution that ensures S’s safety. I’m also praying for J.’s salvation.

More like screaming till our faces are red…

Eugene Robinson says “Americans are in a mood to hold their breath until they turn blue.”

That’s really not the problem.  We’ve been screaming until our faces are red, “Stop spending!  Do NOT take over the health care system!  Do NOT take over the automotive industry or banks!  STOP SPENDING!”

But they aren’t listening.  But no worries, Eugene.  On November 3rd, there will be no screaming.  Just whimpering and from your side of the aisle because you are about to take a serious electoral beating.

Restless

My life is in such upheaval right now – this song just seems really appropriate at the moment.

And after viewing it, I saw this video posted on Facebook – the author of Reason For God, Tim Keller, talks about the main emphasis of the Bible. A paradigm shift for many, and a helpful reminder for all.

Tribalistic Consumers

The Black Informant has an interesting post about supporting Black businesses.   I haven’t got anything to add to what Duane wrote, but it did get me thinking about how we tend to support our own “tribes” – whatever group we align ourselves with – and the ramifications of that.  No, I don’t shop racially.  I shop as seldom as possible, and my first choice is online because I hate shopping.  Shipping fees are an easy price to pay in exchange for avoiding parking lots, unhelpful sales clerks, and obnoxious fellow shoppers.  But I do support Christian-owned businesses when I can, for the express reason that I’m supporting “one of my own.”  I especially support the businesses owned by fellow church members whenever I can.  For Christians, the perceived benefits of patronizing a Christian-owned business usually include the fact that the money gets tithed on again, and the perception of being dealt with even more honestly and fairly than at a secular business.  The downside – if things go wrong, you can’t sue.

That is to say, if events occur under which you’d normally sue, but you and the business owner are both Christians, the bible says you must not sue, but rather, resolve the situation through a mediator or resign yourself to taking the loss.

When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded?
(1 Corinthians 6:1-7 ESV)

The Christian Legal Fellowship has some thoughtful guidelines to consider.   Other religions actually have their own courts – Muslims have sharia courts in England and are pushing to have them here.  (Jews have Beth Din courts – though unlike the sharia courts, they lack legal standing in England.)  There is no Christian equivalent to either.  At most, you could ask the pastor to talk to the other person and mediate between you.  So Christians conducting business within our own “tribe” require an additional level of trust that I’m not sure is required of secular consumers.   Even so, I think it’s worth it.

Whatever happened to…?

The men whose photo launched the invaluable website, HonestReporting.com -

The blatant media bias against Israel is a disgrace, and it’s a full-time job for quite a few people to push back against it. While few people would say Israel is without any fault, the “innocent Palestinian victim” narrative is three lies for the price of one. Is fair, honest reporting really too much to ask?

Bloggers, beware.

Another copyright troll is looking to sue you for the offense of quoting from and linking to their websites.

Few except blatant thieves like Michael Moore take the stance that people have the right to unfairly use copyrighted material.  But Righthaven, LLC is suing bloggers who are using material within the bounds of Fair Use.  It’s a bullying tactic – sue for a huge amount, and settle for a few thousand, because that’s cheaper than going to court even if you win.  So far, Righthaven is suing on behalf of the Stephens Media Group and WEHCO Media which own more than 60 newspapers between them.  So if you’ve excerpted and linked to articles from those papers, you could be slapped with a lawsuit.

Clayton Cramer provided a list for use with the Firefox Blocksite plugin that you can use to ensure you don’t accidentally visit – and subsequently link to – any of the Stephens Media Group sites.  I’ve updated the list to include WEHCO, so the complete block list as of 8/31/2010 is in this text file for your convenience:

blocksites.txt

Or make your own text file block list of the following sites so you don’t, as Cramer put it, “unintentionally visit one of the Evil Empire’s websites.”  You might also want to scour your blog’s archives clean of quotes and links to these sites.

ADDED: And if you’ve linked any of these sites, after you’ve removed the links and quotes, get Google to clear that page from its cache.  I’m adding this because someone just clicked through to the site from a Google cache search for one of these urls.

[Read more...]

So Ibrahim Hooper is Islamophobic, I guess.

I noted recently that Dove World Outreach evidently lacks a Webster’s dictionary, a sense of irony, or both, but does have some Qu’rans to burn on 9/11.  Well, it’s a free country, and consequently people are free to act like jackasses.  But the response from unindicted terror funding co-conspirator CAIR was amusing.  (via Volokh)

“Can you imagine what this will do to our image around the world?” said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington. “And the additional danger it will add whenever there is an American presence in Iraq or Afghanistan?”

I’m not sure, but I think that must mean Mr. Hooper is Islamophobic. After all, he just suggested that Islam is more violent than other religions. That exercising free speech about Islam in one country would cause Muslims in other countries to kill people not involved in the original “offense.” Oops! Religion of peace, much?

Of course that’s the standard, and conflicting, line. Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say otherwise, we’ll kill you. The only reason people like Mr. Hooper are permitted to have it both ways is a press which is both fearful (remember the MoToons?) and sycophantic where any culture but American, or any religion but Christianity, is concerned.  It’s tiresome.

And yes, as Volokh points out, he’s using threats to achieve ideological goals – and affirming exactly what the Dove World Outreach claim about Islam.

Added: and at JihadWatch, “moderate” Mulims pull a Dr. David Banner: “You wouldn’t like me when I’m angry.”